Hubbard Publishes Seven Essays on Diffusion
of Innovations Theory
Visiting
Assistant Professor Susan
McGreevey Hubbard published seven essays in the February 2003 issue
of Evaluation & Program Planning. Based on research conducted
for the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Hubbard's essays include:
"The TIPS Evaluation Project: A Theory-driven Approach to Dissemination
Research," "Use of Diffusion of Innovations Theory to Drive
a Federal Agency's Program Evaluation," "TIPs Evaluation Project
Retrospective Study: Wave 1 and 2," "A Qualitative Study of
the Treatment Improvement Protocols (TIPs): An Assessment of the Use of
TIPs by Individuals Affiliated with the Addiction Technology Transfer
Centers (ATTCs)," "TIPs Evaluation Project Prospective Study,"
"Obtaining Valid Response Rates: Considerations Beyond the Tailored
Design Method," "Application of Diffusion of Innovations Theory
to the TIPs Evaluation Project Results and Beyond."
Parry-Giles & Blair Author Essay on
the Rhetorical First Lady
Professor
Shawn J. Parry-Giles
and UMD alumna Diane Blair, currently of the California State University
at Fresno, published the lead essay in the Winter 2002 issue of Rhetoric
& Public Affairs, entitled "The Rise of the Rhetorical First
Lady: Politics, Gender Ideology, and Women's Voice, 1789-2002." Their
essay maps the rise of the rhetorical first lady from Martha Washington
through Laura Bush, contextualizing the public and private documents of
these political women within the gender ideology of their time.
Cai & Fink Publish Essay
on Culture and Conflict
In
the March 2002 issues of Communication Monographs, Professors Deborah
A. Cai & Edward L. Fink
published "Conflict Style Differences Between Individualists and
Collectivists." In this article, Cai & Fink investigated the
fundamental beliefs regarding cross-cultural differences in conflict styles.
The sample consisted of 188 graduate students from 31 different countries
residing in the U.S. Findings indicated that assumptions regarding the
relationship of culture to conflict style preferences may not be valid.
They concluded that conflict styles are highly multidimensional for both
individualists and collectivists. Even though the five conflict styles
can be subsumed under four types, the items measuring the five styles
cannot be generated from any two-dimensional typology. Finally, the meaning
of four of the five styles is different for individualists and collectivists:
Dominating is the only style interpreted similarly by both groups. Areas
for future research are considered. This article received the NCA Communication
& Social Cognition Division's Article Award in 2003.
Tonn Publishes "Miss
America" Essay
Professor
Mari Boor Tonn' s essay
"Miss America Contesters and Contestants: Discourse about Social
'Also-Rans'" appeared in Rhetoric & Public Affairs, in
2003. The essay is a response from the 7th Biennial Public Address Conference
to a discussion of contemporary feminism offered by Bonnie Dow of the
University of Georgia. In her essay, Tonn argues that "increasing
claims that we have entered a post-feminist era are, in my view, premature.
While the Miss America pageant soldiers on, the ERA long ago
fell short of ratification, never to be revived, Title IX has yet to reach
full compliance at most educational institutions where women students
now outnumber men, and Roe v. Wade, ironically decided on the day
before the cease-fire agreement officially ended divisive U.S. involvement
in the jungles of Vietnam, has since become this generations most
contentious and bloody domestic battleground."
Parry-Giles & Parry-Giles
Publish Book on Bill Clinton
Constructing
Clinton: Hyperreality and Presidential Image-Making in Postmodern Politics,
published in 2002, offers an analysis of the public image of Bill Clinton
as it emerged from a series of texts. In the book, Professors Shawn
J. Parry-Giles and Trevor
Parry-Giles conclude that Bill Clinton's image demonstrated the inherent
hyperreality of U.S. presidential politics, where discerning the "real"
political leader from his or her image is impossible. Peter Lang Publishing
published the book in their series Frontiers in Political Communication,
edited by Bruce Gronbeck (University of Iowa) and Lynda Lee Kaid (University
of Florida). This book received the 2003 Everett Lee Hunt Award from the
Eastern Communication Association.
Aldoory & Toth Publish Study of Gender
& PR
Professors
Linda Aldoory & Elizabeth
Toth authored "Gender Discrepancies in a Gendered Profession:
A Developing Theory for Public Relations," in the Journal of Public
Relations Research, 2002. Their analysis illustrates through literature
and original research a beginning theory that explains the enduring gender
discrepancies in what has become a gendered field, that of public relations.
A survey of public relations practitioners reveals statistically significant
gender differences in hiring perceptions, salary and salary perceptions,
and promotions. These data support several previous studies that have
shown over time gender discrepancies in hiring, salaries, and promotions.
Using theory drawn from other fields as well as original data from a series
of focus groups, authors construct concepts and theoretical propositions
to help explain why there are still gender differences in a field that
is made up predominantly of women.
Parry-Giles & Parry-Giles Publish
Analysis of The West Wing
The
May 2002 issue of the Quarterly Journal of Speech
featured an analysis of the NBC television drama The West Wing,
authored by Professors Trevor
Parry-Giles and Shawn
J. Parry-Giles. Their analysis examined the postmodern quality of
the program's romantic rendition of the U.S. presidency, arguing that
program presents a powerful and meaningful "presidentiality,"
defined as a discursive construction of the presidency with ideological
and rhetorical relevance. The article is an updated version of a paper
that received the Wrage-Baskerville Award from the National
Communication Association's Public Address Division in 2001.
Department Faculty Featured
as Media Experts and Analysts in 2002
Members of the Department of Communication
faculty were consulted and quoted by numerous news media outlets in 2002
on many topics, including the Olympic figure skating scandal, the midterm
elections, and the Trent Lott episode. Professors Kathleen Kendall, James
F. Klumpp, Katherine McComas, Shawn J. Parry-Giles, Trevor Parry-Giles,
Laura Drake Witz, and Andrew Wolvin were featured in the following news
media sources: The Baltimore Sun, The
San Francisco Chronicle, The Daily Record
(Annapolis, MD), The Boston Herald, The
Diamondback, Modern Maturity, Food
& Chemical News, ABCNews.com, NBC
Nightly News, the Omaha World-Herald,
WJLA (Washington, DC ABC affiliate, Channel 7), WTTG (Washington, DC Fox
Affiliate, Channel 5), and Community Television of Prince George's County.
In addition, The Washington Post featured
an article about an event sponsored by the Center for Political Communication
and Civic Leadership.
Parry-Giles Authors Book
on Cold War Propaganda
Professor
Shawn J. Parry-Giles
completed a 10-year study of Cold War propaganda with the publication
of her book The Rhetorical Presidency, Propaganda,
and the Cold War, 1945-1955, in 2002. In the book, published as
part of Praeger Publishers Series in Presidential Studies, Parry-Giles
challenges the scholarly assumption that the rhetorical presidency refers
to presidential messages delivered only from the bully pulpit. By examining
early Cold War discourse, she demonstrates how Presidents Truman and Eisenhower
transformed the U.S. propaganda program into an executive tool reliant
on presidential surrogates in the promulgation of a covert and monolithic
Cold War ideology. In their review, Choice
concluded that "Rekindled enthusiasm for such measures since 9/11
makes this fine book timely as well as relevant," while Benjamin
Fordham (University of Massachusetts) in Presidential
Studies Quarterly noted that Parry-Giles' book "is a useful
account of the development of the official propaganda program. It makes
for interesting reading as contemporary concerns grow about the attitude
of the rest of the world toward the United States."
Cai
Publishes Chapter on U.S. & Chinese Negotiation
Professor
Deborah A. Cai authored "Looking
Below the Surface: Comparing Subtleties of U.S. and Chinese Cultures in
Negotiation," published in Tiger's Roar: Asia's Recovery and Its
Impact, edited by J. Weiss, G. Macapagal-Arroyo, & W.-J. Chen
(M.E. Sharpe, 2001). In this volume, according to the publisher, "highly
regarded Asia policy makers and opinion shapers provide an overview of
a very different, post-economic crisis recovery Asia, and its implications
for the rest of the world, especially the United States."
Cai Submits
Report on Chinese Media to U.S. China Security Review Commission
On
behalf of the University of Maryland's Institute for Global Chinese Affairs
and the Department of Communication, Professor Deborah
A. Cai (Principal Investigator) and Brecken
Chinn Swartz (Project Manager) submitted a report on the Perspectives
toward the United States in Selected Newspapers of the People's Republic
of China to the U.S. China Security Review Commission. The report
is available here (Adobe Acrobat file,
580KB).
The Department's Participation at the
Annual Meeting of the International Listening Association Is a Tremendous
Success
At the annual meeting of the International
Listening Association in Chicago, graduate student Laura Janusik received
the Ralph G. Nichols Listening Research Award for her top paper, "Teaching
Listening." Graduate student Sungeun
Chung and Professor Andrew
Wolvin (with K. Halone of Clemson) placed second in the Nichols competition
with their paper, "The Language of (Not) Listening. ").
Undergraduate major Colleen Marlatt won
first place in the James I. Brown student research competition for her
paper, "Music Therapy for Persons with Senile Dementia: Do We Really
Understand the Depth of Appreciative Listening?" Undergraduate major
Daisy Tillman placed second in the James I. Brown student research competition
with her study, "Medicine and Music Therapy: Implications for Therapeutic
Listening."
Graduate student Lisa Burns presented a
paper, "Empathetic Listening: Engaging Students in the Basic Course."
Laura Janusik, Sungeun Chung, and Andrew Wolvin presented a paper on their
development of a listening inventory instrament. Laura Janusik presented
a paper on the contributions of Carolyn G. Coakley to the study of listening.
Professor Andrew Wolvin was the keynote
speaker at the International Listening Association’s research conference
and was the first recipient of the new ILA " Outstanding Teacher
of Listening Award."
Parry-Giles Publishes Hillary Clinton
Essay
Professor
Shawn J. Parry-Giles
recently published an analysis of news media coverage of Hillary Rodham
Clinton. This research, part of an ongoing project exploring the public
image constructions of the former First Lady, appeared in the June, 2000
issue of Critical Studies in Media Communication.
Parry-Giles examined coverage of Hillary
Rodham Clinton across several television networks. Analyzing both the
discursive constructions of her persona and the visual depictions of Clinton,
Parry-Giles concludes that television news making strategies reify a mediated
collective memory of Hillary Rodham Clinton that is reductionistic, iconic,
hyperreal, and emblematic of television new coverage concerning political
women.
Parry-Giles’ essay was highlighted in the
June, 2000 issue of Spectra, the National
Communication Association’s newsletter. Each month, the editors of
this newsletter select a compelling and timely research article from the
Association’s journals to profile.
Parry-Giles Presents Research
on Hillary Rodham Clinton
Professor Shawn
J. Parry-Giles was recently invited as one of the top young scholars
in political communication to present her research at a gathering of such
scholars held at the University of Texas in Austin. At the 2000 conference,
Parry-Giles presented a paper entitled "Political Authenticity, Television
News, and Hillary Rodham Clinton."
This
research is a continuation of a larger research project examining the
mediated constructions of Hillary Rodham Clinton. In this particular essay,
Parry-Giles analyzes news coverage of Hillary Rodham Clinton during the
early months of her successful U. S. Senate campaign in New York. Parry-Giles
reveals the varied and often highly gendered discursive strategies used
by the news media to authenticate or inauthenticate Hillary Rodham Clinton
as a viable political candidate.
Parry-Giles’ essay was published in Politics,
Discourse and American Society: New Agendas. The book is edited
by Roderick P. Hart and Bartholomew Sparrow.
Parry-Giles Publishes Essay on Cold War
Propaganda
Professor
Shawn J. Parry-Giles
recently published an essay on the militarization of U. S. Cold War propaganda
policies in Critical Reflections on the Cold
War: Linking Rhetoric and History. The volume was published
in 2000 by Texas A & M University Press and is edited by Martin J. Medhurst
and H. W. Brands.
Parry-Giles’ essay is entitled
"Militarizing America’s Propaganda Program, 1945-1955," and
is a wide-ranging discussion of the evolution of early Cold War propaganda
policies and discourse emanating from the U.S. Government. Drawing on
declassified materials from the Truman and Eisenhower Presidential Libraries,
some only recently opened to the public, Parry-Giles traces the shifts
in propaganda policy in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Parry-Giles concludes
that such shifts in propaganda policy led to militarized conception of
propaganda that enhanced the rhetorical powers of the presidency. An earlier
version of this essay was presented at the 4th annual Conference on Presidential
Rhetoric held at Texas A & M University’s George Bush Presidential Conference
Center in 1998.
Parry-Giles & Parry-Giles Publish
Analysis of Clinton Rhetoric
In
the November, 2000 issue of the Quarterly Journal
of Speech, Professors Shawn
J. Parry-Giles and Trevor
Parry-Giles published an analysis of President Bill Clinton’s speech
commemorating the March on Washington. The speech, given on August 28,
1998, occurred within the context of the unfolding Lewinsky scandal, and
Parry-Giles and Parry-Giles explore how Clinton rhetorically molded the
collective memory of the civil rights movement to reconstruct his image
in the wake of that scandal. Specifically, Parry-Giles and Parry-Giles
conclude that Clinton transformed the occasion into a moment of political
nostalgia to bolster his political and personal image. Ultimately, the
address reflected several persistent tensions underlying the Clinton presidency
that continue to demarcate his image in the public arena.
Parry-Giles & Parry-Giles
Publish Reassessment of Political Communication in the U.S.
Arguing
that scholars and commentators are too often fatalistic about politics
in the U. S., Professors Trevor
Parry-Giles and Shawn
J. Parry-Giles recently published a forum essay rethinking this pessimistic
view of political communication. Their work, entitled "Reassessing
the State of Political Communication in the United States," appeared
in the Winter, 2001 issue of Argumentation & Advocacy.
Parry-Giles and Parry-Giles maintain that
academic political observers and media pundits too frequently condemn
political communication as flawed or corrupted. Such commentators, they
suggest, often misread existing political communication practices and
display a nostalgic tendency to find in U.S. history a quality of political
debate and rhetoric that has never existed. Political communication in
the U.S., Parry-Giles and Parry-Giles argue, generally displays a focus
on policy, an ability to elect high quality leaders, and an increasing
democratization via technology and media.
A
version of this essay was presented at the National Communication Association’s
summer conference on politics and the 2000 elections. A revised reprint
of the paper will appear in the forthcoming volume entitled, Communicating
Politics: Engaging the Public in Democratic Life. This book
is edited by Lynda Lee Kaid, Dianne G. Bystrom, Mitchell S. McKinney,
and Diana B. Carlin and will be published by Peter Lang Publishing.
McComas
Publishes Two Articles About the Use of Public Meetings
The
use of public meetings held for environmental decision making is the focus
of two articles Professor Katherine McComas recently published. The first
article, appearing in the February 2001 issue of Communication Theory,
examines how government officials who conduct public meetings feel about
this commonly used - yet frequently criticized - technique for public
involvement. Among other things, the research found that officials were
only moderately satisfied with public meetings, believing that some meetings
occur too late in the decision-making process or that citizens doubt the
credibility of officials conducting the meeting. This belief was in fact
borne out in a separate study published in the January 2001 issue of Environmental
Management. In this study, citizens who attended public meetings about
a local waste site were asked to rate the credibility of government agencies
conducting the meetings. The results revealed a widespread skepticism
among audience members toward the agencies.
Aldoory Publishes Book on The
Gender Challenge to Media
Linda
Aldoory’s newly released edited book, The Gender
Challenge to Media: Diverse Voices from the Field, challenges the
traditional notions of media, ideology, and gender. This edited collection
of articles, all written by graduate students, is a supplemental text
for courses in communication, public relations, media, gender and diversity.
There were several goals for this collection of essays and studies. First,
it has graduate students as authors, who are in the middle of intensively
researching and processing the current information on media and gender
- this type of collection authored by graduate students has never been
published. Second, it offers a diverse range of voices speaking about
the intersections of identity, because authors are heterosexual, homosexual,
European American, African American, Asian American, European, male and
female. Finally, the goal of this book was to challenge future journalists,
public relations practitioners, producers and other communication professionals
as well as future scholars to think differently about their own communication
contributions to society.
Grunig Publishes Book on
Women in Public Relations
Associate
Professor Larissa A. Grunig
is co-author of an important new book, Women in Public
Relations: How Gender Influences Practice. Co-authors are Elizabeth
Lance Toth and Linda Childers Hon.
Professor Glen M. Broom of San Diego State
University calls the book "an authoritative synthesis of the vast
body of knowledge related to gender issues in public relations practice....
It is a 'must read' for educators and practitioners, both female and male."
In the foreword, Kathleen Larey Lewton writes, "This book, and the
massive research effort that led to development of this book, represent
a significant contribution to the public relations profession, to public
relations professionals, and to the organizations, companies, and causes
that we serve."
The authors integrate the theoretical literature
of public relations and gender with results of a major longitudinal study
of women in the field, along with illuminating focus group and interview
data. Topics covered include factors contributing to sex discrimination,
how public relations stacks up against other professions on gender-related
issues, the challenges facing female managers and entrepreneurs, the experiences
of ethnic minority professionals, the salary gap, the glass ceiling, and
how to foster solutions on individual, organizational, and societal levels.
Back to top
|